Saturday, 22 August 2009

Banksy in Bristol


I stood for four and three quarter hours to get into the wretched Banksy show today, all the way convincing myself it would be worth it, that it was the cultural event of the year because it was an outstanding achievement. Periodically, I gave passers by doleful looks, just in case they didn’t see the metaphorical cross on my back as represented by my perma-scowl and my increasingly pronounced limp, caused by flowering foot cramps and torrid misanthropy after hearing the inane droning of others in the queue.

The queue didn’t stop at the museum’s entrance. We filed past some garishly painted portaloos, made up to look like Stonehenge. The first photo opportunity. I waited, patiently, as every person in front of me fucked their photo up a few times, due to a trickling of punters exiting the show, past this first, and last, piece of art.

We shuffled a little more, finally entering the museum proper, past a trashed ice-cream van, complete with real-life security guard inside. People, however, had caught a glimpse of the selection of statues scattered around the entrance hall. And decided to take photos of these instead. They smiled in front of the camera, the shutter clicked, and their morose expressions took their faces back over.

We entered a room stuffed with Banksy paintings. I could see most of these becoming t-shirts pretty soon. Some self-serving audio was being played somewhere; miscellaneous guff concerning Banksy as grafitti artist and public menace. I remember reading something about that a few years ago.

We were advised not to take flash photography. So many people packed the galleries, most of whom were flagrantly disobeying this advice, the gallery minions had stopped enforcing the policy. I was forced to look longer at some of the art, getting increasingly bored of it, as I waited for a line of people in front of every picture, fuck their photos up a few times (thanks to people being less considerate, walking across the frame).

By the staircase, were animatronics, some of which were previously displayed in New York, in cages. The swimming fish sticks had seemed to stop swimming. I felt as processed, taken advantage of and tired as the chicken, now in chicken nugget form, feasting on its water bowls, full of BBQ sauce. Instead of the mother hen looking over me, I could feel Banksy’s stare from somewhere. I remembered the stencilled message on the side of the museum ‘This is not a queuing opportunity’ and swear I could hear laughing from somewhere.

Things were quieter upstairs, except for the odd family charging through the galleries, past the Renoir, the George Stubbs the Beryl Cooks trying to find the ‘hidden’ Banksy exhibits.

Ultimately, I was only in there for an hour. Bansky has become part of the establishment. He needs to go beyond these visual equivalents of sound bites, which look so attractive on t-shirts, warranting perhaps a ten-second glance in a gallery, and create something which would deserve more scrutiny, and less attention.

Friday, 21 August 2009

Update

Oh God, I'm so terrible with updating this. Going to Banksy in London tomorrow; will write something about this. Promise!

...meanwhile, new reviews *all the time* at www.eyeforfilm.com

Wednesday, 22 April 2009

Something I wrote for Transition Tradition recently...sorry for the lack of posts...will do better, promise!


Sneaky Sound System's debut album

It took a while, during which they have tantalised us with UK support slots opening for the likes of the Scissor Sisters, but the debut by one of Australia’s biggest dance acts has finally landed in Britain. It promises twelve tracks of punchy left-field house tracks, and for the majority of its length, it delivers.

Opener ‘I Love It’ sets the tone; the straightforward vocals from former rock singer Miss Connie Mitchell undercuts the shimmering, infinitely bum-shaking beats. It also showcases the strengths of the album; the clean production of the music is one of its keen strengths; even when the melodies and the beats are more beige than white hot, the record feels classy. Other standouts include ‘UFO’ and ‘Kansas City’; unpretentious tunes with dancefloor filling potential.

Whether it’ll break through to the mainstream in the UK is anybody’s guess. There is some pretty fierce dance floor competition from the likes of Les Rhythms Digitales and Felix da Housecat; both acts’ output easily rivals the material on this CD. Occasionally, when Sneaky Sound System try to do something a little bit different, treading on the toes of LCD Soundsystem Territory, they do fall flat, and this is highly detrimental to the CD’s success. Such examples include ‘16’, with its marriage of more traditional house with retro synths; none of these mild experimentations and deviations have anything on James Murphy’s patented geek-dance-rock.

However it’s a solid album, and if you’re a dance fan or house purist it’s something that’s worth at least a listen. There are a handful of really quite good tracks on here, that would go down in a storm in even the most snobby London clubs. Those who are looking for some more unusual club fare should, however, probably wait for the next album by LCD Soundsystem.

Sunday, 8 March 2009

Sunday, 15 February 2009

New stuff...

I've got a couple of new reviews up on Eye for Film...

Modern Times
Trailer Park of Terror

I can't link to 'em because of the frame set, but check out the site here: www.eyeforfilm.com

Thursday, 12 February 2009

Monday, 9 February 2009

Hopelessly devoted


Sigh. I bloody hate it when I have to choose between my heart and my head. This was my dilemma with The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. My common sense, my sensibilities, everything cerebral, was in screaming agony throughout the sometimes quite arduous 163 minutes of David Fincher’s latest movie. On the other hand, my heart was melting into the thick layers of treacle the film trowels on to the audience.

Based on a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the movie tells the story of the titular character (played by Brad Pitt) who ages in reverse. More specifically, he is born with the medical complaints, internal organs, looks and skin of an old man, but without the experience and physical size that his body’s age entails. As he goes through life he grows physically younger. The only time his body and his mind physically match is when he is about 40.

He falls in love with a couple of girls, and seems to live a thousand life times. He has an affair with a married English ex-pat in Russia (played by Tilda Swinton), and has a on/off relationship with his childhood sweetheart (played by Cate Blanchett). He sails the seas in a boat, and rides a motorbike like James Dean. He travels to far off lands to find himself.

It’s a strange odyssey, and one that models itself equally on Forrest Gump than on its source material. The plot interweaves itself amongst historical and cultural events like World War Two, the Beatles, the space age of the 1960s and, eventually, Hurricane Katrina. Characters come and go with careless abandon, like the historical events back flipping through the film. Like the Gump, it’s chocolate box Americana; all set to a syrupy soundtrack and looking good enough to eat.

This is part of its problem. A film trying to encapsulate its time simply cannot include everything, and omissions will be made. It’s going to be arbitrary. Also, to complicate things, it’s a film which is at once cod-philosophical, fable-esque and romantic. However, it becomes problematic when casualties of its ambition include such notable omissions as any kind of racial tension. This is despite being set throughout the twentieth century in the Deep South. Likewise, there is no mention of the Cold War, the effect of the 60s on America, any talk of the aftermath of WW2. It’s incredibly insular and self-absorbed for something consciously set to the backdrop of history.

On a less extraneous level, it also suffers from a lack of sense, of focus. Frequently the story focuses on Cate Blanchett’s character rather than Brad Pitt’s. We are never sure who the real victim of the situation is. If it’s Brad, then his ‘degeneracy’ into adolescence and childhood at the end of the film nullify, or at least bluntens, his tragedy. He doesn’t know, he doesn’t care. He doesn’t love in the same way as he did any more. Likewise, Blanchett’s narrative is confused. We are not told what happens in her life after Button and before her deathbed revelations. It’s a blank. But it matters if we are to believe its her tragedy. We need to know the effect Button has on her.

Yet, don’t Cate and Brad make a gorgeous couple? Isn’t their romance beautifully, yet inevitably, tragic? Isn’t aging a horrible thing? Look how unsightly Cate and Brad can be when they’re all wrinkly. Truly the worst tragedy of them all.

It’s easy to be seduced by the film’s wishy-washy middle-brow pseudo-philosophical charm. Its gorgeous cinematography, the, admittedly, quite incredible special effects that see Brad aging. It’s all compelling stuff, I admit. The film, however, is so half-baked in its history, and so faulty in its storytelling, I could never believe in whatever reality it is trying to construct. It’s a struggle to get through.